INVESTMENT OPTIONS AND THRESHOLD RANKINGS
Antigua and Barbuda, Egypt, and Saint Lucia attain the highest score for the Investment Options and Threshold pillar with a score of nine which reflects both the value and investment diversity offered to applicants. Despite the increased minimum investment threshold for the Caribbean nations following the Memorandum of Agreement (MoA), Caribbean programmes remain comparatively competitive, and combined with their broad selection of investment options secures their top ranking. Egypt has further built on its diverse investment options which include refundable deposits, business investments and government contributions by liberalising real estate options to also include non-government-approved housing units.
St. Kitts and Nevis follows with a score of eight, with the longest-standing CBI programme retaining its investment threshold competitiveness while offering a varied number of real estate, development fund, and philanthropic options.
Türkiye and Vanuatu follow in third place with a score of seven. While the former boasts the largest number of options of all active CBI programmes, Vanuatu’s recent implementation of a Coconut Oil Fund (CNO Future Fund) option provides an interesting avenue to invest in the Island’s sustainable future.
With a score of six, Cambodia, Dominica and Grenada follow in fourth position. While Cambodia offers two distinct avenues for philanthropic investment, Dominica and Grenada offer slightly more competitive investment thresholds. Jordan follows in fifth with a score of five, which reflects the Middle Eastern country’s comparatively high investment threshold and lack of philanthropic options for investment, with the latter point being an aspect it shares with Malta which follows in sixth position with a score of four. Austria takes the final spot with a single point, with entrepreneurial and philanthropic investment options not enough to offset its considerable investment threshold.